Questioned the theory geocentric of the life

Las vacaciones de Hegel por Magrite
Questioned the theory geocentric of the life
By Fabián Núñez Baquero
25/09/2008

A team of Spanish scientists has discovered in the space to 700 years light of the Earth a molecule called very complex naphthalene, the same one that when being irradiated with ultraviolet rays and combined with water and ammonia, it produces fundamental amino acids for the development of the life and naftoquinonas, substances precursors of the vitamins. The news underlines:
Their detection suggests that good part of the key components in the terrestrial chemical prebiótica could have been present in the interstellar material starting from which was formed the Solar System.
Publico.es > Agencias > EFE > El naftaleno se ha descubierto en una región de formación estelar de la constelación de Perseo, en dirección a la estrella Cernis 52. EFE - Santa Cruz de Tenerife - 19/09/2008 14:04
The naphthalene is also in the meteors that have bombarded the Earth with more force before of the beginning of the life. This discovery brings up that the English great scientist Fred Hoyle insinuated when he/she was the meteorite of Tunguska - the reference is in its book The Intelligent Universe -, in which would have been material fundamental for the life. It is more, Hoyle suggested that the comets are those that transport with more frequency the chemistry of the life and they exercise a work as if they were who deposit those seeds in the planets. What makes us affirm that the comets would be kind of a sperms of the universe. To more than that he questioned with good arguments Darwin's theory and, mainly, the conception that the life was originating of the Earth.
Until he/she ended up saying that these materials when falling in the Earth were responsible for certain epidemics that spread and that the doctors attributed to different origin. It pointed out that there were many forms of molecular life that resisted towering temperatures. This coincides with the statement of the Spanish scientists Susana Churches Groth, Stained Arturo and Aníbal García, of the Institute of Astrophysics of The Canaries that the terrestrial chemical prebiótica would have been present in the interstellar material from the same formation of the Solar System, what implies that that material resists high temperatures, as much as under zero.
Now then this discovery comes to question in the whole line the conceptions of the origin and the formation of the life in this planet, one of whose classic books have been the famous one The origin of the life of Oparín, very well-known and disclosed by the Stalinist ones in schools and universities. The life is not of origin - neither could it be it - terrestrial. It is very probable that also in biology - and not only in astronomy - we have been geocentric, as well as in the rest we always spread to be anthropocentric. Also, that almost irrational desire of many science fiction writers and idealistic scientists of pointing out the man's planetary possible extra filiation, he/she would find a scientific explanation now but already with a real discovery, and I don't eat product of abductions or of fictitious visits of extraterrestrial beings.
Of course only the philosophy of the dialectical materialism has always outlined the material nature of the life as a result of endogenous laws to the objective reality. Talvez is good to remember, in this sense, the overwhelming words of León Trotsky in this respect
We call materialistic to our dialectical one because it is not based on the sky neither in our "free will", but in the objective reality, in the nature. The conscience arises of the unconsciousness, the psychology of the physiology, the organic world of the inorganic one, the solar system of the nebulas. In all the links of this chain, the quantitative changes transformed into qualitative jumps. Our thought, included the dialectical thought, is not but a form of expression of this changing world. In this system there is not place for God, neither the destination, neither the immortal soul, neither has it stopped norms, laws neither moral eternal.
León Trotsky: En Defensa del Marxismo- El ABC del materialismo dialéctico.

In any event the distinctive of this discovery is that it doesn't only confirm the conceptions of the dialectical materialism, but rather, also, it determines the inobjetable he/she witnesses of the contemporary life and even previous to the formation of the solar system. And if it is previous to the formation of the solar system, then we can say with all truth that the life doesn't arise in any planet and, we could even generalize that the life is present as factor endogenous consubstantial to the same matter. And if this is this way, we can with more audacity to affirm, then that the life, as the same matter of which is factor and it leaves, it has never arisen in such or which planet, in such or which stellar system, but rather it is eternal in the time and in the space, eternal in the everything and in the part.
But the life this way in possibility, in presence always eternal, it would be a seed that is dispersed in all the unimaginable planets of the universe, but it only flourishes, it is developed and it fructifies in those whose conditions are capable for their bloom.
But the life this way in possibility, in presence always eternal, it would be a seed that is dispersed in all the unimaginable planets of the universe, but it only flourishes, it is developed and it fructifies in those whose conditions are capable for their bloom.

We would rot - at the same time - a statement that he/she can appear as negative to rush or discriminatory, but in all ways we make it: the existence of those capable planets for the development of the life in no way is very general that say. We would say, even that being the life a highly selective and elaborated phenomenon for whose reality millions of millions of years of stellar preparation are needed, they are very few, very few the planets in the universe that you/they have an appropriate habitat to develop the life.
If the last statement makes sense, we should take care of the life in the Earth in such a way and with such devotion as if the only one that existed in the universe was maybe.
And, to culminate, if at all there are very few planets that hold the life, perhaps never for the enormous ones and insolvable distances that separate us of them, we will arrive that is with certainty neither of them neither of the life that is unwrapped in their habitat.